Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nadja Gilchrist vs Catherine Harrison Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gilchrist vs Harrison analysis and find out who is favored!
Nadja Gilchrist vs Catherine Harrison Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gilchrist 1 - 0 Harrison
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gilchrist has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Harrison has won 49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gilchrist, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Harrison has won 59.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 43.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gilchrist has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Harrison has saved 52.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gilchrist has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Harrison winning 65.38% (W/L 34/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gilchrist has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 79/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13). Harrison has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 31/ 30).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gilchrist winning 1 times and Harrison being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gilchrist winning 2 and Harrison winning 0. The last match between Gilchrist and Harrison was at the Toronto, 28-10-2018, Q2 round, I.hard with Nadja Gilchrist getting the victory 6-4 7-6(11).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gilchrist and Harrison have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gilchrist winning 0 times and Harrison 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gilchrist winning 1, and Harrison 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gilchrist has played against opponents with an average rank of while Harrison has played against players with an average rank of 197.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gilchrist has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Harrison has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gilchrist has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Harrison has converted 48.8% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
397
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
351
Rank
214
High
30
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
62% (106-64)
Career Total W/L
58% (202-149)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
73% (27-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$165,120
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nadja Gilchrist vs Catherine Harrison For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gilchrist VS Harrison
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Nadja Gilchrist | Catherine Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:16:0 | 2:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (50/87) | 60% (58/97) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (32/50) | 72% (42/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 36% (14/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 21% (3/14) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (41/97) | 39% (34/87) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(11) |
Stats 
Nadja Gilchrist
Player
Catherine Harrison
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nadja Gilchrist | Catherine Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (27/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (56/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (430/323) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (22/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 60 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 109 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:39:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 188.46 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (1485/2234) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (913/1485) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (367/749) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (163/334) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1132/2281) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (22/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (25/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (26/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 12% (26/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 36% (11/4) |
Nadja Gilchrist Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Nadja Gilchrist
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magali Kempen
Player
Nadja Gilchrist
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
Player
Nadja Gilchrist
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Nadja Gilchrist
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nadja Gilchrist
Player
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
2
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
9
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
26%
(
10 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
54 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nadja Gilchrist
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadja Gilchrist
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nadja Gilchrist
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Vdovenco
Player
Nadja Gilchrist
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Nadja Gilchrist
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Catherine Harrison Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Catherine Harrison
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Akasha Urhobo
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Savannah Broadus
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Victoria Hu
Player
Catherine Harrison
50%
(
55 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
86 of
122)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
49 of
86)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
122)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Alexandra Bozovic
68%
(
88 of
130)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
0
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
48%
(
62 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
110)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
94)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Mia Horvit
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 7-5 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Solymar Colling
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
43%
(
17 of
40)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Gilchrist Vs Harrison Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gilchrist are available here and Harrison photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
